I didn't consider Game of Thrones misogynist any more than I consider Tudor history misogynist as that was what this series seemed to draw inspiration from. Why is it people today can't seem to understand the difference between depicting something and endorsing something? At no point during Game of Thrones did I feel like the programme makers were endorsing a misogynist view. Can't get past the sex/nudity/rape/violence? Don't watch. The depiction of these things, even if they are gratuitous, don't constitute misogyny in and of themselves, as dramatic features in a story.

On the other hand, there are certainly misogynist undercurrents in classic Hollywood era films such as The Women, Annie Get Your Gun, and Carousel, as well as umpteen classic film noirs, and none of these contain any nudity, etc. It's about what the film (or series) is endorsing, rather than mere aesthetics. Objectification isn't misogyny either, or at least not necessarily. And let's face it - everyone objectifies to a degree, if they're honest.

On a lighter note, my wife and I used to take bets on how many (female) nipples and other body parts we'd see in an episode. One time I predicted three nipples. My wife told me I was crazy to pick an odd number, but hilariously, the episode in question featured a breastfeeding scene, so I was proved correct. An astonishing fluke.