Regarding each criticism:
1. I despise the use of identity politics to discredit a film, from either side of the debate. So for example, I have equal contempt for articles claiming The Last Jedi is bad because it features a female lead, black lead, and not a white male lead, that the film is somehow "emasculating", etc, as I do for those making lunatic assertions that, say, Lawrence of Arabia is a bad film because it doesn't include any women. I care about one thing only: Is it a good film? Neither argument has anything to do with the quality of the film.
As an aside, I do think it is valid to criticise so-called "woke" culture when it attempts to put forth a facade of authority, demanding what we must and must not watch, for our own good. But confronting such Orwellian nonsense isn't something one does in a film review, but in a separate rant (see link below, for instance).
https://simondillon.medium.com/are-we-allowed-cancel-cultures-illusion-of-authority-d68ab8312711
2. Nitpicking is only valid as a criticism if it genuinely shatters suspension of disbelief. In the case of Jurassic Park, it doesn't (I didn't even know about this gaffe until you pointed it out). As for the stormtrooper banging his head, that's such a famous mistake that George Lucas actually added a "thunk" sound effect when it happens on the 1997 rerelease (which got a round of applause from fans at the Odeon Leicester Square London screening I attended on the opening night of the rerelease - that was a great night and a great audience).
3. I am not a fan of Michael Bay, to put it mildly. And the Transformers films are ghastly. But I agree that's a stupid criticism, because no one needs permission from anyone to enjoy a film.
4. I agree that's a silly criticism to make. OK, so it wasn't what you expected or even wanted, but you still need to be objective and review what it was. However, I think the Star Wars prequels are bad, regardless of nostalgic rose-tinted spectacles, and most of the reviews I was aware of at the time (from people like Barry Norman, Mark Kermode, and Peter Bradshaw) reflected this, rather than the fact that they were different. The scripts are really poor, and the badly written characters of Obi-Wan, Anakin, and Padme are no substitute for Han Solo, Princess Leia, and Luke Skywalker, who really formed the heart of the originals.
Here's how I would have approached the Star Wars prequels, if you're interested:
https://medium.com/cinemania/how-id-have-written-the-star-wars-prequels-813d867e688a
5. This statement is the one from your list that I truly despise. Anyone making such a statement in a review has no business being a film critic.